The Greatest Dangers to American Freedom

The Greatest Dangers to American
Freedom are A Government that ignores the Constitution …  Thomas Jefferson

I have to differ and I shall use Thomas Jefferson's own words to justify my difference from this
opinion of his. … it is for the peace and good of mankind
that a solemn opportunity of doing this every nineteen or twenty
years should be provided by the constitution, so that it may be
handed on with periodical repairs from generation to generation to
the end of time … We should be not worried about government and those that use it to their advantage
'ignoring' a piece of paper but must work as a Nation to ensure that WE John Q Non-hyphenated American as political
beings can influence the Government more than the Money Changers that
have bought our Nation's heart and soul! To the end of tossing said
money parasites out into the Sea. So that we can have control over our lives again!

Now to the Greatest Dangers.

The greatest dangers have always been:




1.) That the Constitution allows for no means to go directly
to John Q Public with the issues -- it would have never passed into
law if it did!  ( Plebiscites work: Switzerland is hardly an
Anarchy now is it?)



2.) That said public has no means of
recalling officials, representatives or judicial figures or
challenging a laws application, intent or validity.  ( again
constitutional referendums work in most of the Western States, they
are rarely used and almost always work out for John Little Dude
rather than Wally Big Street. )



3.) It does not lay out what
is taxable, what is income, or what for that matter under what terms
'gold and silver' equate to money in commerce -- and this is its
fatal flaw allowing the 'nation' to be subject to the Credit
Oligarchy. ( Basically unless a Nation controls the issuance of its
own Credit and the value and volume of the same it cannot be strong.
The Nation does somethings better than Wall Street. For more on that:
http://newswithviewstoo.blogspot.com/2014/07/to-summarize-and-attempt-to-systemize.html)




4.) The very notions upon which the Constitution are based
lack the concept of "DUTY" being tied to 'RIGHTS' and
without that there can be no lasting order. When 'right' becomes a
matter of not a performed minimal level of input but rather of just
being alive ... you are bound in time to end up at A-Modern-ica and
its failed PC status.  This again is a fatal flaw. 'Equality' is
great and all but when the 60 IQed psychotic pre-primate is 'equal'
to the 130 IQ Saintly Sage ... something is very very wrong and logic
and ethics are being very sorely abused or forgotten. Those that do are equal to those that merely take, cannot work. All who make a certain level are treated the same -- that can work, under certain rules. But total equality is NOT possible because it is NOT part of natures reality.



5.)
There is nothing in the Constitution that stops the government from
doing 99% of what it does ... Mass Immigration is Treason from the
Right's POV but it is NOT unconstitutional in the least ...
Liberalism needs ditched ... 

 The Document will be set aside at some
point:  "Let us provide in our constitution for its
revision at stated periods. What these periods should be nature
herself indicates. By the European tables of mortality, of the adults
living at any one moment of time, a majority will be dead in about
nineteen years. At the end of that period, then, a new majority is
come into place; or, in other words, a new generation. Each
generation is as independent as the one preceding, as that was of all
which had gone before. It has then, like them, a right to choose for
itself the form of government it believes most promotive of its own
happiness; consequently, to accommodate to the circumstances in which
it finds itself that received from its predecessors; and it is for
the peace and good of mankind that a solemn opportunity of doing this
every nineteen or twenty years should be provided by the
constitution, so that it may be handed on with periodical repairs
from generation to generation to the end of time, if anything human
can so long endure." --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval,
1816. ME 15:42



And for more:



"Every constitution,
then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of nineteen years.
If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right. It
may be said, that the succeeding generation exercising, in fact, the
power of repeal, this leaves them as free as if the constitution or
law had been expressly limited to nineteen years only. In the first
place, this objection admits the right, in proposing an equivalent.
But the power of repeal is not an equivalent. It might be, indeed, if
every form of government were so perfectly contrived, that the will
of the majority could always be obtained, fairly and without
impediment. But this is true of no form. The people cannot assemble
themselves; their representation is unequal and vicious. Various
checks are opposed to every legislative proposition. Factions get
possession of the public councils, bribery corrupts them, personal
interests lead them astray from the general interests of their
constituents; and other impediments arise, so as to prove to every
practical man, that a law of limited duration is much more manageable
than one which needs a repeal." --Thomas Jefferson to James
Madison, 1789. ME 7:459, Papers 15:396



So simply meet under
Color of Article V and have a Convention of Right/Center Loyal Americans from rural counties of a majority of states. ( have state delegations that vote as blocks for final vote as a de facto People's 'Congress' and there you go ... letter of law means NOTHING if the WILL to be a LAW is present!) It seems the 'lawful' way
forward from this impasse and a way that most of Majority America could accept.  The internationalists, money bags and let us be frank minorities/special-victims-under-PC that would reject it: They shall not be consulted.



I suspect at some point Patriots will do
just this to save what is left of the Nation IE their people. Under that Article Lays the power to write an entirely new organic document of any type desired.

The Descent into utter Madness

We all know the adage about
'those the gods would destroy they first make mad'. 

And true to form here we the
western people find our self whirling about madly like a dervish in
front of the electric marching orders deposit. The group mind has
taken in so many kooky, crazy, and outright magical thoughts that it
is impossible for us to know truth from false from within the
system as it stands. We must abandon all attachment to it and set our selves free from its madness; stop acting foolishly expecting fools errands to end well; and become our natural selves yet once more.

To do this we must challenge the core concepts that underlay modern PC 'egalitarianism' as they exist in the Anglo-sphere nations and Particularly the UK and USA.

There are many key concepts
like 'Tolerance' and 'Diversity'. But to my mind the primary one that
seems to underlie a lot of the rest of the concepts and give them
meaning is called 'White Guilt'. This underlies most of the rest of
the plot to overthrow our nation. This concept creates the apathy among the masses and is the reason that so many of our own young are becoming cultural eunuchs that help with the task of killing off our ways and ultimately our kind.

White Guilt is PC's
'original sin' of sorts. ALL White People have this guilt for the
acts of ALL other WHITE PEOPLE from all time to all time, even the
poor since they have the 'advantage' of being poor Whites not dirt
poor blacks! (IN fact if they complain of working to pay taxes so
that they can live about equal to the Blacks who don't work by and
large – that is a sure sign of 'racism' and hatred. )

The logic, as such, runs
like this: Being born White means you are 'racists' and 'hate'
coloreds because IF WHITE then racism and hatred! If Racism and
Hatred then Diversity is needed. Diversity means
non-White-non-male-non-traditional so If any White (males more than
females as they are 'victims' in their own right) object to paying
for PC, then more non-Whites (or even worse traitor liberal White
Eunuchs) are needed to combat 'racism' IE ensure PC has its tax-base
of White (traditional normal anti-PC) Males in check.

That is their Dogmatic
Formula – The Anti-racists you will notice share the methodology of
the Feminists and Homosexual degenerates who are also subversive to
Western Society, while being simultaneously parasitic upon the masses
of people that in fact make up Western Society. They are all in this
way equal to Liberals -- they all use 'white' as an insult
about equal to 'Nazi' or 'fascist'. Just like the other subversives.
Just saying. (And the GOP does not talk about 'white' only us
Normals do that. Accept it: We are doing our own lifting to get out
of this. )

Whites are therefore told
that if they just tolerate diversity – meaning the glorification of
every other POV and activity but those of the WHITE MAJORITY –
and therefore if they give up EVERYTHING special about themselves
that they MIGHT just after enough groveling, tax give aways, 'social
justice', social programs, single mother homes, raped women folk, and
social degeneration to the level of the third world
wash away this 'sin' committed by people that in most cases were not
even their own ancestors by blood. And many of them at least play
along if not actually believe this mamba! And all this on a 'might'! Madness!

It goes without saying that
Whites Males that won't embrace gender equality, 'sexual equality',
and every other moon-bat liberal pacifist eunuch creating culturally
destructive idea unconditionally are the ultimate enemy of all
Mankind – the Oppressor of Victims (who are everyone else but the
non-Eunuch White. )

It is purely nonsense.
Egalitarian Gibberish invented by Commie Subversives! It has about
as much substance and reality behind it as Celestial Spheres or
Squared Circles … IE it is a fools quest lacking empirical or moral
foundation. To agree with PC is to agree to your own subjection to PC if
you are a White Male, who rejects 'equality' and the rest of the feminine mantra put forward by the 'left' in modern Anglo-sphere
nations.

To have it again: It has NO
basis in truth, logic or ethics. The reality is that not one of us
has any moral, ethic or logically demonstrable responsibility towards
the Blacks or any other person outside OUR kind, and who is not loyal
to OUR interests. Period.

The Reality is that not one
of us has any responsibility for any slave, slave owner or the
'injustices' that created.

The Reality is that not one
of the issues or problems among the Blacks is our issue, they have
been given everything needed to succeed except those things which are
INNATE and lacking to them!

The Reality is that Blacks
and Minorities make their ghetto hoods and not racism or poverty or
'hatred'! The minorities do that themselves! The inhabitants make the dwelling! Not the other way around!



The reality is we are tired of accepting illogical pap like the above as normal good sound wholesome thinking!

The reality is that WHITE
MEN are feed up with being told to tolerate being punks in our own
lands, being told to tolerate being victimized by rapists thieves and
murders. Being told this is their own fault when they clearly
understand it is PC and its PETS doing this to them!

The
Reality is that soon WHITE MALES are going to tell PC and its Pets to
STFU and then History is going to change in a big f'ing way! Now I
wonder if they can hear the Gods Laughing at them like Commodus?

Tales about things like the Movement

And Thus It was Spoken in Olden Times about the Movement:

A few Simple Questions for the 'Far Right Movement'?

Direct Questions for
the Far Right Movement slash European Nationalists:

This should be simple. Basically for
some background: I had shown a few persons the 'movement' in all its
glory. They took in a bit of the views and opinions, on the forum
boards this one among them. Looked around a bit. And had some
questions.



Questions which will be asked by NORMAL
working class European-Majority-People when you finally leave the
nets and try to engage in Real World Politics.



You can
take them personally if you must, but they are rewordings of actual
questions asked about YOUR movement by normal people that did not
want to post to your sites. Those people were heavy on
'right-winger-ness', and 'equality' was utterly absent from their
thinking, if you will, so they were not automatically biased against
European-Majority-nationalism.



Thus it would be rather
cheap and lazy to dismiss them with childish retorts about not
needing sheeple, and 'we will do what we want' and the like …




They are legitimate real world questions that any
valid well thought out political program ought to be able to answer
about itself, without angst and in a calm level headed manner. If you
are to be 'European-Majority' Nationalism you might want to address
some of the European-Majority-People in the Nations Questions. This
will in theory bring the masses on side with you. Which is not bad
because European-Majority-nationalism needs MORE and Better
European-Majority-People!



And
that is the stone cold truth.



Questions:




What is the end Goal of European-Majority Nationalism?
What has it done to ensure these goals comes about? What are the
means to be used to get to those goals? In very simple terms explain
how reaching this goal will be of advantage to the Nation at
large?



What other than 'European-Majorityness' are you
offering? Better wages? Better conditions of employment? Lower taxes?
Less debt? Better cheaper housing? Freedom from Usury? Debt Relief? A
return to better morals? And end to Off Shoring and In Sourcing of
jobs? Other?



Is there a unified message that can be
encapsulated as a 'slogan' or 'program' of sorts? Who is the 'target
demographic' of said slogan and what is being done to ensure they get
and take to the 'message'? What steps if any is
European-Majority-nationalism taking to ensure
European-Majority-nationalism controls its message rather than being
controlled by the media message about it?



What sort of
government founded upon what basis? Created in what realistic manner?
How does the movement intend to erect this government? And where?




Will there be a 'free market'? If so, what will the
relation between the government and 'market' be if any? Who will
control the issue of credit? What will be money? Under what terms?




What proposals does European-Majority-nationalism have
for how and under what terms the nations credit will be provided?
What will be its basis? Will the public or private or some mix of
interests issue the money used in day to day life by the citizens of
the European-Majority-nationalist nation? Will extra-national forces
be allowed to influence this credit? Will the currency be a commodity
as well? If there is to be a profit from the issuance of currency who
shall take in said profits, private or public entities?



Will
the plutocratic elite keep their wealth after
European-Majority-Nationalism? Will the insider corporations keep
their wealth and power after European-Majority-Nationalism? What will
be done if anything to keep them from buying any
European-Majority-Nationalist state like they have bought the Current
Regime? Will they be allowed to flee to the four corners of the World
and plot against us or will they be dealt with domestically?



To
sum up all the questions: What will be so radically different from
right now, or 50 years ago, that following
European-Majority-nationalism’s lead is a worth while endeavor for
the common European-Majority Man? What
will the common European-Majority MAN actually GAIN by supporting
European-Majority-Nationalism over say Populism or Radicalism, or
frankly any political movement that is not internet based? Why should
they side with
European-Majority-Nationalism *?



Again
Any decently thought out political-social-economic movement ought to
be able to answer these sorts of questions in an orderly clear and
concise manner. If a movement cannot even do this simple task: how
shall it rule even so much as a village?



*
And before
the tools try the 'you should just give because' nonsense …. Even
the NSDAP understood this simple fact: If you don't offer solutions,
you are not helping your Folk.


ALL
the actual real world Right Wing movements came with REAL WORLD
solutions to REAL WORLD issues that really affected REAL working and
lower middle class Folk! See the 26 points of the Falange, 25 points
of the NSDAP, and the Italian Labor Charter for more all documents
that I find Normal European-Majority-People respond very well to as
long as they don't know the origin of said documents!