Just one more time! * alright I am lying it will repeat as many times as needed!*

So just once more through folks: 

The Oligarchy has your number.

They are not nice cuddly people. They have a tight grasp on most everything:

This about sums up the way it goes as it is.

Another way to think of the same basic idea.

The oligarchy is based upon credit and debt and power over the control of the money that they enjoy:

This is not a joke.

The above is where it goes ... and to those that call for either the left or right to 'save' them inside the 'two party' system, the next three are for you:

Just to hammer home WHO actually holds the two party whip hand.

The GOP has been right on the front fighting the Oligarchies fight since ... party politics!

Are you a blue-dog working majority stiff? Then the Dems are using you, dummy!

The fact is that the organized parties are a lost cause, what needs to be done, IHMO, is for normal people to band together, make wealth, and work towards being more reliant upon other local people:

The Credit/Debt Game is not needed.

The reality is that work and not credits make value and worth.



And with that:

 
 If you are not angry you are one of the thieves!

A recap of my beliefs ...

 
Here for those new to the party:

The elite use their pawns, the left and right wings to create the body 'majority politics' ( a majority of plutocrats), which then imposes upon you. Not hard to understand at all Junior.

To recap my Basic
Beliefs about Everything.

The
basic fact of human societies, is that all human beings are born into
a group of a mother and a father. These two persons had to mingle
flesh, so that each and every person on this planet could be
produced. And this holds true even if scientific so called
artificial means are used to facilitate the creation of life, because
the sperm or egg cannot be created artificially and thus a male and a
female are still necessary for the procreation of life.

This
basic fact, of human existence means that all radical individualism,
is utterly false at a minimum and at a maximum a destructive belief,
which wastes saved capital from the past, and ensures that there will
be no productive future. This being said, it is also untrue that
societies of humans, are hives of bees. We cannot operate like
insects do; this is not possible.

Therefore
it follows, then a middle ground must be found between these
extremes, which allows for the individual to exist and the group to
not be negated and which allows for the group to exist and for the
individual to not be negated. This may sound like some sort of
mystic dualism, but this is only true, if you accept the idea that
individuals and groups are necessarily in conflict.

Once
you accept the reality that they complement each other, the apparent
mysticism dissolves. A very solid proof, for the necessity of
groups, to the existence of the individual, can be demonstrated from
nature, in which all humans live in tribes, villages or some other
group of at least an extended family. There is no man woman or child
home in the natural order of things, who exists without a past,
family and a society into which they were born. Yet on the other
hand there is no group that is not comprised of individuals and again
we see that there is no conflict or contrary between the group and
individual  -- they are complementary.

The
most basic group is again the family group, then it expands to the
extended family, then to tribes, then to nations. This is the natural
organic progression. Families are a proto-statelet and clans are
states in all but name.

From
this basic reality of human social organization, it follows that all
societies, must like all just families, find/make/ensure – the
semantics are not important –a place for all their members. It
simply true that everyone in a society must have some use, purpose,
or function in the society or they shall become alienated, and not
hope for the best interests of the society at large. Everyone must
have a purpose, everyone must put in and everyone must get their
right and just due. This is the basic moral doctrine of any correct
political/social/economic system, anything else is not satisfactory
and must be rejected.

In
our modern terms, this means that each head of household, must have a
homestead, work that will provide for the upkeep of said homestead, and that
these two bedrock conditions must be legally protected from economic/legal
forces, otherwise in time men with money, will ensure that some
citizens are pauperized and cannot properly raise families to
increase the citizen body. Thus to make it more general it follows
from the above, that a just society restrains economics to the needs
and interests of the members of the society. And that further, a
just society views the components of society all the way down to the
tribes, families, and particular people as members of a larger family or if you
will as parts of an organic whole all having needs, and who all
contribute to the common good. Yes it is true that the above means
in part that each and everyone won't get to just do as they please,
that is true. But nothing in it should be implied to mean that
anyone would be stopped from earning an honest living. Honest shall
be defined to mean not legally but MORALLY correct within the above
precept about Everyone counting.

In the
natural order of things, Work, physical and mental, are the means to
meet the needs of both the individual and the group, which at a
minimum are: food, clothing, shelter and lastly some sort of weaponry
with which to protect these other things. Work is also an end to
ensure that each has their material to contribute to the common good and his particular good which are tied together.
It is important that psychologically each think himself to be an
active part of the community's life as such to ensure their loyalty.
Thus from this odd view it is both an end and a means to other ends.

Also
it must be admitted that in the natural order of things, there are
only so many hours to everyday, and that only so many of these hours
can be put to work and allow for the conditions outlined above which
necessitate a certain amount of leisure time for the citizens. Thus,
without a right to work and earn one's way, a place to stay, cloth on
one's back,food in one's belly, and a sufficient amount time of
leftover to live well, the Rights to life liberty and the pursuit of
happiness are meaningless and empty promises. They were after all
proclaimed by very very wealthy men, after all, and in truth.

In
fact it is only when these basic conditions of living are met that
anything like freedom or any other abstract concept has any real
meaning whatsoever, as there are done it all practical realities
going to be few to any, starving, penniless, vagabond, bestial
philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, or great world leaders; and
this is an overreaching fact. The opposite is also true that any
livelihood work, occupation which does not provide for these minimal
conditions, is no just work at all and is not right or CORRECT in any
way shape or form. I shall go so far as a state that any work which
uses up a significant portion of the workday over any significant amount of the
week should pay a living wage as that work/time can never be had back, and
the person must yet eat be housed and be clothed. Workers Live and
thus require Living Wages: No exceptions.

It is
obvious that in any just, proper and stable, polity, for a citizen,
to have any meaningful use, of what we conveniently call rights, he
must have his needs in life met, and still have time necessary to
enjoy his life and engaged in the pursuits required of free citizens
in a free state ie he must have education and leisure as well as the
opportunity to work by which work to earn a livelihood for his
family, and by extension his nation's organic being.

Economics'
was invented by human beings, for their ends, humans do not exist for
economic ends. Thus any theory or belief that postulates that
economics control men or that modes of production are dominant over
human will is false. Since it is a penultimate truth that human
activity IE human will, created economics and all value judgments as
we know them now--there being no mode of production in nature sans
human beings. The small matters of economics are merely matters of
human will, money merely being an invention of our minds, it is
absurd that it should be our master.

In a
preceding paragraph effects were discussed briefly, economics has a
great number of unintended consequences when it is simply allowed to
be pursued blindly for pure personal profit and with no regard for
anyone else. Part of these effects which should be taken into
account are of course the effects that any large scale industrial
action action has on the environment around us, as that environment
is our home writ large. This is not to say that we should abandon
industrial society, it is only to say that we should balance the
needs of an industrial society with the realities of what nature can
and cannot absorb in the line of pollutants destruction and the rest.
This is also to say that natural resources, should not be used willy
nilly, to the benefit of private companies and to the loss of the
commons.

The
simple fact is is that, no company, no person, no group of persons,
have a right nor ideally should have any legal ability, to do the
common people harm, for mere return on investment or market gain.
The idea would be similar to saying that, in the days of the cave,
one person should have the right horde the food and sell it all the
others. Do you think your ancestors would have tolerated being treated
like this? But this is the market, where some horde, and some go
hungry, and you golden calf worshipers, call this
moral and just. But I say a market was born in theft, a royal theft
at that. And that its freedoms are never free, and quite the
contrary are always attached to interest, debt, pauperization,, slavery
resource depletion, and over extension, which will in the long-term
ensure societal collapse. The market demands more resources from
nature eventually than can be had, thus it is a false paradigm. A
further truth is that if you look at the birth of both the Bolshevik
economy, and the early English industrial economy, both feature the same
sorts of population transfers, murders, thefts of the common persons
wealth and its concentration into the hands of a few favorites.

Thus
the common paradigm in which there is a free market and communism. A
controlled market and a free market, are false contrasts. They have no
real validity. 



The fact is that yes, you should be free to engage in
commerce or economics, but, only, if, that commerce is honest and not
destructive to to the homeland, the hearths, and/or the common
citizenry who make up the base of the social system upon which you
engage and commerce. That is in so much as you engage in commerce
honestly and within the rules as establish for the common good you
shall be let alone and protected by the might of state, with the
blessings of all good men. It is as easy as following the rules, paying taxes, and doing call ups, really.

I see
nothing there that does great injury to anyone's ability to engage in honest fair business. Those of you on the other hand that would wish to do
underhanded business, who would wish to cheat the nation by doing
business with foreigners at the expense of the nation you will be
driven out like vipers, routed for the good of all as good old Andy
Jackson put it.

From
here it is only a matter of choosing a political system ... it will
be a mixed system ... I advise the tried and true combination of a
Head of State; a Council; and an Assembly of the People. From all
time to all time, this repeats, you will not escape it.

The
only thing that remains is to determine if YOU shall control the
process, or if others based upon what ever qualification shall do the controlling. I will let the diagram below speak for my thoughts no the matter:

This
is actually the most simply part as if you have a proper society and economic order, there is little for the political arm to take care of
outside of national defense and keeping basic order among the parts.
Proper society of course is one in which the MEN over a certain age
determine for the rest what shall be and what shall not be, by means
of first their Familial authority over their own homes which then is translated into political control. The only system that works is to
tie voting with call up and paying tax, while simply only allowing
men to do call up. Anything else is modernist subversion. Period.
IN reality this is the most stable social form ever found and that is
why the modernist PC bots hate it so, as it is a very very hard nut
to crack. Even the limpid remnants are giving them a good go, the
return of Masculinity has them terrified.
Especially
the confuse members, of the feminine half of the species, who have grown
to like lording it over the beta Males that are conditioned to put up with them. This
planned
revolt against
'patriarchy' ie normalcy is
outlined by Frederick Engel's
in several of his
works and to a lesser extent by Karl Marx. It is also a common theme among the 68'er commies and the Frankfurters who are commonly understood to be Political Correctness or Cultural Marxism.  Traditional society was destroyed harpy by harpy, harridan by harridan, Jewish Mother by Jewish mother. 

And
this is where men who reject PC, must
run straight into modernity's main supporters the 'liberated women' and 'free adult' 18-21 year old child who make up the bulk of voters between them.  These voting blocks are the reason sanity can never be had at the poll as females are not reasonable and children are dull, thus both are easily tricked by the media into doing what is expected ...



Fortunately, voting is an OPTION, at least any vote that includes anyone not born with a penis who is over a certain age of understand is FULLY an option.



The real fact is that a group
of angry upset adult men, who have a large enough mass and distribution, have no need of these
concepts that have allowed all this insanity called PC.  



I will let you in on a secret: Liberal modernity can lie to itself,
but males are always the strong backs and sharp spears, that keep any system standing, in all times and places and that does not and cannot 'evolve' without the degenerate display that is modernity.
Once the men trapped by this abnormal and unnatural system mentally defect and find/realize/confirm that their interests are no longer served
by this PC egalitarianism and modernity, then it is absolutely
assured that something very much like the patriarchal society I call
for will reemerge from the rubble and rebuild among the ruins that is modern PC matriarchy. 



It is assured, since
once the goodies, the services and the games ( video and otherwise ) can no longer distract
the young men, and they realize that they have been robbed of their
future by Mommy PC and the Matriarchs,homos, minorities, and other churls who hide behind 'the system' it is my feeling they will do what any White Man would do: Slap reality back into line!  

And as always:

If you are not angry you are one of the thieves!

Let Us Assume

( Note Video is NOT text read, they really have NO relation, except that they pound on the Poor Man's Drum. Carthago Delenda Est! Liberale Delenda Est! )



And today we delve further into insanity ....

And just to be sure ....

The Current Same Ole Same Ole.

 Above is what you have now: A few at the top are immune to the will of the rest and just lord it over us as if we are serfs. Fact. Theory is Not reality.



Now I propose that something more like this :

A better ideal where the society works as a whole for the good of the whole.

 Notice that above the means the oligarchs have used -- ie the media, courts, industry/commerce, banking, and public education --  are under the direct power of the people, not of some far removed immune 'absentee land lords' that are merely using the 'market' to mark up prices and drain us dry.



The basic ideal is that societies are NOT groups of competing individuals but are organic wholes.   The premise is that the conflict in the system as we see it today is based upon False and Wrong ideals concerning Money, Man and their Relationship.



Men labor so that they can obtain the things they need. If the conditions diagrammed below are meet people can produce their good and services. Notice you need organized labor, resources/land and that is really about it, since capital is REALLY and ONLY a form of resource and NOTHING else at all.  It is a means that man found to get to the ends of Food, Clothing, and Housing.

The key idea behind ALL my economics.

People work on land, and produce primary items such as food, unprocessed items and the like, further work is put into making items into other items until they are either used or exchanged.



Or people have been pauperized by the Oligarchs in diagram #1 above and thus the are not doing well.

If you control the volume of the credit and the rate of interest you get a cut of all the action.

 And the above is the very basic truth about the Bankers Empire over you and you and me and the rest. They get us both ways running because they control our credit and in essence charge us to borrow our own labor from them at interest!  I say that is not rational at all.  And that a system were the imaginary money is issed debt free and backed by our production capacity and not subject to exchange on the 'market'. You see the banks and the market are a two for one deal, and I reject both.



Thanks Again, Best to You.



PS:

And as always:

If you are not angry you are one of the thieves!

Something to Ponder Folks

 So we find our-self needing a new diagram:  

The Basic Idea is to band together; ditch the phoney left-right divide; and rebuild regardless of the oligarchs and their cronies. 

One person is weak and easily overturned; thousands are more difficult to deny.

And there it is again.

       And some gibberish to set it in stone: 

                                                               
And some more: 

 

And as always:

If you are not angry you are one of the thieves!

Inflation, other matters, and more ramblings from a madman!

What do you get when you add insanity, observation and modernity: Hell if I know as I just work here!

And for the first part of zero parts: 

 

                                                   And for the second part of zero parts:

                                                   

                       And of course NO post is complete without at least ONE diagram!  

People form Land Management Companies, these LMC's help fiance farms, farms band together politically and socially as Farm associations; FA uses clout to form credit union, CU uses credit to further long term goals of people ... repeat.

The Idea here is that if you put people's labor to land and then use those products one has a functioning economy that needs little but effort, and labor on the part of the people on the land in question and ideally can sustain itself from within again all without.

And I ask you plain: Would you rather rule your life or have another that has NO interest in you and yours rule your life? It is just that easy. If you want to rule; then duties must be taken on and sacrifices made. 

  And as always:

 If you are not angry you are one of the thieves!

No bias -- I hate both parties equally, like a good redemopublicrat.

 And for a bit more catapult. Fire at will.

And we cannot forget the diagrams:

Folk working together is the key most important thing.

Either You Rule Your Life White Man or somebody else rules over you. No middle ground exists.

A way to organize people to resist the oligarchy. People form clubs; clubs funnel members to other organizations that pool money; pooled money is used to put people onto land where they can produce items needed to live and learn to be self sufficient; these people are organized into associations; associations form up a Credit Union; CU uses credit power that was created by peoples labor to help further peoples goals.

People on Land using labor produce EVERYTHING that is needed if 'land' is meant to include all natural resources and capital made from those resources. This is the real truth. If you have access to land and labor and have time ... you have goods.

If you are not angry you are one of the thieves!