Today we talk about the MONEY and KINSEY ... IE we talk about child sexulation and the roots of so called 'gender ideology' ... we will see it is Marxist to the hilt. It is anti white anti male and anti Christ.
Alfred Kinsey: The Prophet of Pedophilia and Modern Sex Education
How one “junk scientist” unleashed a plague of corruption and contagion on America and the world!
Be careful if you are a parent or planning to be one. Books like this one are for children aged 9 and above. Not only are they available in public and school libraries, but they are also part of the elementary school curriculum.
When did that start? When was it decided that we need to start teaching kids about this stuff at such a young age? The answer is: Kinsey
“Children could, with the assistance of an experienced adult, enjoy a sexual activity from the moment they were born”. (Alfred Kinsey)
The Junk Science: babies are orgasmic
Alfred Kinsey was born on June 23, 1894. In the American culture at the time, parents didn’t talk to their kids about sex until puberty, and even then would not be explicit about it because they understood the power of human curiosity. If you talk to a child about this, they will be curious about it and want to investigate further and try it, and that’s not a positive result, no matter what modern psychologists tell us about being “sex positive,” etc.
Kinsey was an atheist “social reformer” who wanted to rid American society of Judeo-Christian values. For everything that Christianity preached for, he did the exact opposite. For example, sex outside marriage is a crime in Christianity. Kinsey and his wife agreed that both could have sex with other people as well as with each other. Christianity is also against homosexuality. However, Kinsey had sex with other men, including one of his students.
In the name of science, Kinsey claimed that children are “sexual and potentially orgasmic from birth ('womb to tomb); are unharmed by incest, adult/child sex, and often benefit thereby.
He believed that true happiness is found in a life of perverse sexual experimentation, regardless of age, claiming that children could with the assistance of an experienced adult enjoy a sexual activity from the moment they were born.
All orgasms are “outlets” and equal between husband and wife, boy and dog, man and boy, girl, or baby — for there is no abnormality and no normality. As the aim of coitus is orgasm, the more orgasms from any “outlet,” at the earliest age — the healthier the person.
Kinsey’s Pedophiles (Source: YouTube)
A Liar and Rapist
What came out was that his research was fraudulent. Kinsey based his conclusions on data collected from convicted sex offenders and child molesters. His research was conducted in prisons, not in everyday America. He also admitted that he had interviewed nine men who had sexual experiences with children and who told him about the children’s responses and reactions.
He also performed horrific sexual experiments on children, some under the age of one. His most influential book, Sexual Behavior in Human Male, published in 1948, contains an infamous chart (table 34 )that documents the “orgasms” of very young kids including babies as young as five months old. Kinsey regards the screams of babies as orgasms!
But instead of suffering the consequences of his heinous actions, he was and still is celebrated by academia and Hollywood. His ideas form the foundation for sexual education in public schools today.
In her book, Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America, Judith Reisman, Ph.D., mentioned:
In Paedophiles in Society, Professor Goode states that the evidence from his books proved that “his work was based on the rape of children.” Kinsey says “the only ‘abnormal’ sex is no sex; that the ‘human animal’ needs orgasms; and that the earlier boys and girls have orgasms, the better for them.” Both his books stand on these claims, backed by ‘copious data’ some gotten from adult recall but according to Gebhard most from men: manipulating’ children, aged from birth to adolescence. Under both national and international legislation, this is (and was at the time) child sexual abuse. Where it involves penetration, as it clearly did in some cases, it is (and was at the time) rape.
At minimum, Kinsey’s disturbing allegations and conclusions are illogical, contradicting the conservative nature of our World War II generation. Worse, Kinsey’s “work” regarding the sexuality of teenagers, pre-adolescent children, and infants is horrifying. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female provide abundant evidence of child sexual torture by Kinsey’s ‘researchers,’ who engaged in brutal, sexual experiments on children. This ‘work’ is critically important to the effects of the Kinsey reports on our society, our laws, and the Kinsey lobby today.
Although Kinsey’s research had been debunked, the results of his findings had long-lasting and overarching effects. According to the RSVP America Campaign:
Laws had been changed in nearly every state, eliminating protections for women and children across the nation. Such vast changes to the law were made possible by the American Law Institute’s Model Penal Code, using Kinsey’s data to implement widespread policy reform. The Model Penal Code was instrumental in the deconstruction of law, medicine, education, the Church, and the military, thereby affecting the overall moral fortitude of all other fields within our society.
Kinsey is regarded by many as a precursor to the so-called sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s. He would be very happy with our culture today.
It seems there are hidden forces behind junk science
+++
Death anniversary of Alfred Kinsey: ‘Father of sexual revolution’ who claimed babies have orgasms, child rape benefits victims
Alfred Kinsey was credited for authoring pioneering reports on human sexology that radically upended the prevailing view on sexual relations between humans. Kinsey’s research work is said to have influenced social and cultural values not just in the United States but across the world.
25 August, 2021
Jinit Jain
The dubious legacy of American sexologist who hypothesised that infants have orgasm
Alfred Kinsey(Image Source: OutinPerth)
24391
25 August 2021 marks the sixty-fifth death anniversary of one of the most controversial figures in American sexology, Alfred Kinsey. On this day in 1956, Kinsey died after Pneumonia had put him in a hospital and decades of chronic heart ailment had tired him down.
But before his death, Kinsey was credited for authoring pioneering reports on human sexology that radically upended the prevailing view on sexual relations between humans. Kinsey’s research work is said to have influenced social and cultural values not just in the United States but across the world. He was dubbed by the New York Times as the ‘father of the sexual revolution’.
Born on June 23, 1894, Alfred Kinsey went on to complete his majors in Biology from Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine. After completing his education at Bowdoin, Kinsey moved to Harvard University’s Bussey Institute, where he pursued the institute’s much-vaunted biology program. His interest in various forms of sexual practices piqued in 1933 after discussing the topic extensively with a colleague, Robert Kroc. Since then, he had devoted himself to the research and study of sexology.
From 1938 until his death, Kinsey conducted more than 17,000 face-to-face interviews with a broad set of people—college students, prostitutes, and even prison inmates—to understand their sexual experiences. His most infamous research subject was the 1944 interview of a sexual omnivore, who had a history of having sexual encounters with men, women, boys, girls, animals and family members, and which took about 17 hours to be recorded.
The results of his comprehensive interviews were published in two separate volumes— ‘Sexual Behavior in the Human Male’ (1948) and ‘Sexual Behavior in the Human Female’ (1953), also known as the Kinsey Reports, as well as the Kinsey scale. Kinsey’s reports stunned the entire world, stoking massive controversy during the 1940s and 1950s. Even today, almost 75 years since the first volume was first published, the findings and the methods employed by Kinsey remain deeply controversial and are hotly debated around the world.
While a set of people hailed the American biologist for revolutionising sexual customs, breaking taboos about the discussion of sex and challenging centuries of beliefs about human appetites and capacities, another set of people considered Kinsey as a paedophile, adulterer, attention-seeker, pornographic “filmmaker” and an addict, whose sole objective in carrying out research on sexology was to normalise and legitimise his many illegal fetishes.
Children from birth have orgasm, paedophilia and incest sex benefits children: Alfred Kinsey
Among the many shocking findings in Kinsey’s Reports, arguably the most scandalous one was about young children, as young as infants, observing orgasm. “All orgasms are “outlets” and equal between husband and wife, boy and dog, man and boy, girl, or baby? For there is no abnormality and no normality,” the Kinsey Report said.
Not only did Kinsey hypothesise that infants are orgasmic from birth, but he also suggested that incest relationships and paedophilia benefit children. In his writing, Kinsey asserted that there was no proven medical or other reason to forbid incest or adult-child sex. “Children are sexual and potentially orgasmic from birth (womb to tomb), are unharmed by incest, adult/child sex, and often benefit thereby,” a women’s rights group stated regarding its findings.
Regarding human sexuality, Kinsey opined that humans are naturally bisexual but religious precepts and prejudices have forced people into chastity, heterosexuality and monogamy. The American biologist also endorsed sodomy, saying that all forms of anal intercourse are natural and healthy.
In “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,” touted by Kinsey’s disciples as the first major attempt to measure scientifically the range of human sexuality, the sexologist noted that sexual taboos and sex laws are routinely broken, and called for the elimination of all such taboos and sex laws. Kinsey believed that moral standards regarding sex result only from “cultural conditioning,” not from timeless guidelines for what is right and what is wrong.
The Irish Times recorded in a report, “But was he a scientist – or a voyeur and latent paedophile? He observed and filmed men and women having sex in various combinations. He had sex with some of his subjects and with his researchers and so, too, did his wife, Mac. He exchanged lewd, locker-room limericks with his students and got his young researchers to discuss their wives’ masturbatory habits. Once, when he had set up a sado-masochistic session involving two men, the researchers had to step aside occasionally when Mac came in to change the blood-stained sheets. He interviewed young children about their ideas on sex and incorporated the research of a self-confessed paedophile into his own work.”
Despite being aware of the acts of paedophilia, he never reported anything to law enforcement authorities.
With mounting allegations of pedophilia against Alfred Kinsey, John Bancroft, then director of the Kinsey Institute, said, “[Kinsey] obtained information about children’s sexual responses from a few of his adult male research subjects, one in particular, who had been involved in sexual activity with children. Resiman [sic] is entitled to disagree with Kinsey’s use of such evidence; she is entitled to the opinion that no researcher should obtain information from a sexual offender without reporting it to the police; she is entitled to question the validity of such evidence; but she is not entitled to make the allegations of criminal behavior on Kinsey’s part. He did not promote this activity; he did not train anyone to carry out such observations; neither Kinsey nor any of his research team was involved in any sexual experiments on children; and none of them was in any sense, a pedophile.”
Kinsey was a fraud who sought to normalise his illegal sexual obsessions: Critics
Even though Kinsey’s tendentious body of work had triggered outrage across the world, the mainstream media at the time was occupied with glorifying the biologist as one of the foremost authorities on sexology rather than probing the allegations levelled against him. Decades later, as the monopoly over the control of popular discourse became diluted, more people came forward to criticise Kinsey’s methods and his findings.
In 1990, a lady named Judith Reisman spearheaded the anti-Kinsey campaign. In her book titled “Kinsey, Sex, and Fraud”, Reisman called Kinsey a charlatan, whose research work engendered an array of social afflictions plaguing the United States.
Reisman argued that the rising number of divorce, abortion, sexual promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, illegitimate births, cohabitation, pornography, homosexuality, sadomasochism, rape, child molestation, sexual crimes of all types, family breakup, endemic violence, etc. could all be attributed to the findings of the scandalous research undertaken by Kinsey. The author said Kinsey’s deductions cannot be described as normal sexual behaviour because they are based on evidence collected predominantly from prison inmates.
“If the public learns the truth, the sexperts in the field of human sexuality and the sex industry will be shaken to its foundations. . . . Whole shelves of books will have to be rewritten. Both public and religious schools will have to discard their sex ed courses. Lucrative public grants will dry up,” Reisman said.
She even alleged in her book that Kinsey was a paedophile. The Concerned Women For America later concurred with this view and declared that Kinsey-based sex education has put children at risk. In a scathing report, the group termed Kinsey’s research on sexology as fraudulent and inaccurate and asserted that it was biased towards his personal agenda and not towards exploring human sexology.
The report also highlighted how Kinsey’s research formed the bedrock of the sex education policy in the early 60s. “The sex-education revolution began in the 1960s when Kinsey’s disciples dominated the academic committees that issued accreditation for sex educators. Before this, sex education consisted of human biology and reproduction, hygiene and marriage. After Kinsey released his findings, several groups advocated teaching children that they are “sexual beings” from birth and that they need to be aware of all types of sexual behaviours,” it said.
John Bancroft, then director of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction at Indiana University in Bloomington, in 1995 made a stunning revelation about the research undertaken by Kinsey. In an interview, Bancroft hinted that the numbers and findings in the Kinsey report might have been manipulated.
“The material in the tables came from one man, an extraordinary man with incredible numbers of sexual experiences on which he kept very careful notes…Kinsey gives the impression that the data came from three or four men, but it was just the one,” Bancroft said while raising aspersions on the validity of the findings of the Kinsey Reports.
++++
Dr John Money and the sinister origins of gender ideology
How a cruel, amoral experiment helped birth today's trans movement.
LAUREN SMITH
5th February 2023
Share
Topics
IDENTITY POLITICS
LONG-READS
SCIENCE & TECH
WORLD
We are all too familiar today with the basics of trans ideology. That biological sex does not determine one’s ‘gender identity’. That someone born biologically male can become female. And that we need to affirm a person’s ‘gender identity’, even if that person is a small child. What few perhaps realise is that the intellectual origins of so much of trans ideology can be traced back to the work of one man – sexologist and psychologist Dr John Money (1921-2006).
New Zealand-born Money was a pioneer in his field of sexuality and gender. In 1955, he was the first person to use the word ‘gender’ as opposed to ‘sex’ to draw a distinction between the biological attributes and the behavioural characteristics that differentiate males from females. He subsequently popularised terms like ‘gender identity’ and even founded the world’s first gender-identity clinic at John Hopkins University in Baltimore in the US in 1966, specialising in the psychological and medical treatment of transgender patients. Above all, Money pushed the view, so central to today’s trans movement, that though we may be born with biologically determined sex characteristics, they do not determine whether we are male or female. Without Money, it’s unlikely that trans ideology, especially the phenomenon of ‘trans kids’, would exist today in the way that it does.
Not everything Money believed about gender has been absorbed by the trans movement. He believed, for instance, that when children are around two years old they pass through a ‘gender-identity gate’, which locks in their gender for the rest of their lives. Few trans activists would make such a claim today. But the central idea that Money first developed is still upheld by trans activists today – namely, that being male or female is not biologically determined. This is the idea that drives trans ideology, and the notion of trans kids, today. It means that someone can be born with male genitalia, but they can still ‘become’ female.
So why is Money rarely mentioned by those promoting trans ideology today? You won’t find him cited in Stonewall educational guides. You won’t see him quoted in any Mermaids documents. And you won’t hear the #BeKind brigade paying tribute to him. The reason for this is simple enough: John Money’s work was creepy, cruel and amoral – and left a trail of misery, pain and suicide in its wake.
The tragedy of David Reimer
Money’s views on sex and gender were initially developed through experimentation on intersex babies – infants born with neither definitively male nor female sex characteristics. In Money’s view, the best way to treat these babies was to use hormones and surgeries to ‘stream’ them into one gender from as early an age as possible. The sex organs the children were born with ultimately did not matter – the most important thing was that they were raised wholly and exclusively as that chosen gender. Money’s recommendations and methods had a profound influence on the treatment of intersex children and were widely accepted until relatively recently.
The betrayal of <em>Charlie Hebdo</em>
PODCAST
The betrayal of Charlie Hebdo
SPIKED
According to an essay in Salon, however, intersex children were not Money’s main concern. He was more interested in the gender-identity development of children with normal sex characteristics. He wanted to apply his theory about the malleability of gender to all children. The problem, of course, was proving this hypothesis.
It would be impossible for Money to test his theory on ‘normal’ infants. What mother would allow her healthy baby to be ‘streamed’ into the opposite gender, undergo countless surgeries and intensive therapy sessions, all for something that might not even work? But then, as a 1997 Rolling Stone essay recounts, David Reimer fell into his hands.
David Reimer as 'Brenda' aged 10, and while living as a male at 18.
David Reimer as 'Brenda' aged 10, and while living as a male at 18.
When he was born in 1965, David Reimer was a perfectly healthy baby boy. Known then as Bruce, he was one half of an identical pair of twins born to Janet and Ron Reimer, a working-class couple from Winnipeg, Canada. Eight months after his birth, however, he was the victim of a tragic accident – one that would set in motion one of the cruellest medical experiments in recent history.
The Reimer twins were born with normal male genitalia. But when the twins were seven months old, their mother noticed that both of them were having trouble urinating. A doctor diagnosed them both with phimosis, a relatively common condition that can be easily fixed by circumcision. It should have been a routine operation.
Early one morning, while the twins were undergoing surgery, Janet and Ron received a phone call. Something had gone wrong. Either through malpractice or error, Reimer had suffered severe injuries to his penis.
Doctors were unable to perform a reconstruction. And so, in the words of a psychiatrist consulting with his parents at the time, Reimer would be ‘unable to consummate marriage or have normal heterosexual relations; he will have to recognise that he is incomplete, physically defective, and that he must live apart’.
Reimer’s parents were distraught. They visited countless specialists in the hope of finding some alternative, but the answer was always the same. There was nothing to be done. That was until one evening in December 1966, when Janet and Ron Reimer were watching television. They caught a programme in which a charismatic doctor was detailing his pioneering work at the John Hopkins gender-identity clinic in Baltimore. Dr John Money even claimed that a man could be transformed into a woman.
Convinced by Money’s confidence and having nowhere else to turn, the Reimers reached out to him. They quickly received a response. They thought they had at last found someone who might be able to help their son. And Money had at last found his ideal test subjects.
The Reimer boys were identical twins and, unlike the intersex children Money had previously been working with, both were born with definitively male sex characteristics. This meant that in Brian, David’s brother, Money had the perfect point of comparison, or ‘control’. This was a chance for Money to test his hypothesis that all babies were born gender-neutral and could be streamed into a chosen gender.
By the time the Reimers made their first trip to see Money in 1967, he had earned himself a reputation as the US’s leading expert on gender disorders. Janet and Ron trusted him. It was unclear how much they truly understood about the procedure, and whether they knew how experimental it was. They just thought that Money was offering their son the chance to have a normal life – albeit as a girl.
Janet and Ron were still hesitant. But Money was persistent. He urged them to allow Reimer to undergo an operation to remove his testicles and construct a vagina as soon as possible – before the ‘gender-identity gate’ was closed forever. He also proposed that, when Reimer turned 11 or 12, he could be given female hormones. According to Rolling Stone, Money hounded Reimer’s parents, impressing on them the need to make a decision about the surgery before it was too late. And so, against the advice of other doctors, they agreed to allow the then 22-month-old Reimer to undergo clinical castration and the construction of female genitalia.
So began a lifetime of suffering and trauma.
As per Money’s instructions, Reimer’s parents raised him under the pretence that he had been born a girl. Now renamed Brenda, Reimer was put in dresses and offered dolls houses and a sewing machine to play with. No one outside of the immediate family knew about Reimer’s complicated medical situation – even his twin brother was led to believe that Reimer had been a little girl all along.
Despite his parents’ best efforts, Reimer always felt that something was wrong. Speaking in interviews later in life, he explained how both he and his brother sensed there was something out of the ordinary about him. He rejected his mother’s offers to put on makeup with her and he tore at the lacy clothes she dressed him in. Around age 11, he described to a psychologist that he had an intense fear that ‘something [had] been done to [his] genital organs’.
At school, Reimer exhibited tomboyish behaviour and was teased by his classmates. Even his teachers did not fully accept him.
Worse still were the yearly visits to see Money in Baltimore. According to Rolling Stone, both he and his brother, Brian, were subjected to gruelling ‘counselling’ sessions, during which Money would probe the twins about their sexual development. From around the age of six, they were questioned by Money on their sexual desires and preferences, and were shown naked pictures of other children and of adults having sex. He asked them to strip off their clothes and inspect each other’s genitals, sometimes with as many as five or six other colleagues observing. Sometimes, Money would take pictures. Most perverse of all, Money would often ask the young twins to ‘play at thrusting movements and copulation’, pretending to have sex in various positions while he watched them. When the twins refused to do as he said, he would reportedly become irate and scream at them until they complied.
As Reimer told one interviewer, both he and his brother grew to dread these annual visits – even more so as Reimer approached the age of eight. This was when Money began to broach the subject of further surgery, in order to finish the internal construction of Reimer’s vagina, which at that time was purely cosmetic. For Money, this was of the utmost importance – he did not believe that a psychological sex change could be completed without physically changing the appearance of the genitals. For Reimer, this was what he had begun to dread most of all. His aversion to surgery came partially from an intense fear of hospitals and needles, but also from the sense that this would ‘trap’ him into a gender in which he felt increasingly alien.
Trans-rights activists protest in New York City, 23 February 2017.
Trans-rights activists protest in New York City, 23 February 2017.
In 1972, when Reimer was seven, Money published his first findings from the so-called ‘twins case’. It was portrayed as a resounding success. In Man and Woman, Boy and Girl, Money and his co-author, Dr Anke Ehrhardt, described how remarkably feminine Reimer had turned out, illustrating their ‘success’ with cherry-picked anecdotes from Reimer’s exasperated, but always hopeful, parents. They said that Reimer enjoyed playing with his dolls and doll house, especially in contrast to his brother’s love for cars and tools.
The media were soon championing Money’s work. In 1973, the New York Times Book Review described Man and Woman, Boy and Girl as ‘the most important volume in the social sciences to appear since the Kinsey reports’ and billed it as having finally solved the age-old question of nature vs nurture – landing firmly on the side of nurture. For Money, the case became the foundation upon which many of his future writings were based. It helped to legitimise the practice of sex-reassignment surgery for children across the world.
The twins themselves were considerably less happy. As Reimer grew older and began to approach puberty, his intense alienation from his own body only became more unbearable. According to Money himself, the mere mention of undergoing hormone treatments or surgery to David was enough to result in a ‘panic so intense that it’s impossible to broach any conversation on such matters without the child fleeing the room, screaming’. But for Money, there was no going back. The onset of puberty made it necessary to give Reimer female hormones as soon as possible.
Reimer’s doctors, psychologists and parents all managed to coax him into taking oestrogen by the time he was 12. But the crucial operation was still a source of great conflict between Reimer and the adults in his life. In one incident in 1976, Money attempted to have a transsexual adult, who had undergone similar procedures, talk to Reimer to ease his fears. This culminated in Reimer running to the top of the clinic building and threatening to kill himself if he was made to see Money again. That would be the last time Reimer went to Baltimore. Money visited Reimer’s parents once more at their home in 1979. The twins attempted to hide in the basement for the duration of Money’s stay. After this, Reimer never saw Money again.
With Money’s influence removed from Reimer’s life, the adults around him began to lose faith in the transitioning process. And Reimer had more freedom to live how he wanted. At age 14, he stopped living as a girl entirely. One by one, the medical team that had tried to implement Money’s treatment plan gave up on the idea of subjecting David to any more surgeries. Later, they had doubts about continuing to keep up the ruse at all.
In March 1980, Reimer’s father picked him up from his weekly psychiatrist appointment, drove him to get ice cream, and told him everything. By his 16th birthday, Reimer had changed his name from Brenda to David, was taking male hormones and had had his breasts surgically removed. He also underwent an operation to construct crude, non-functioning male genitalia.
Learning the truth about his sex did not ease Reimer’s suffering. He tried to kill himself twice before the age of 21 – on one occasion, his parents doubted whether they should try to save him. ‘That kid has done nothing but suffer all his life’, his mother recalled thinking at the time.
Things began to look up for Reimer when, in 1990, he got married and adopted his wife’s three children. For a while, he even settled down into some semblance of a normal life. It was during this period that the true nature of Money’s experimentation on him became public. Milton Diamond, a fellow sexologist and academic rival of Money, had long believed that the experiment on Reimer was fundamentally flawed. He managed to track down Keith Sigmundson, who had previously overseen Reimer’s psychiatric treatment, and together the two of them decided to set the record straight about Money’s findings.
Compiling interviews with Reimer, his wife and his mother, Diamond and Sigmundson’s paper was published in 1997 and proved incredibly controversial within the scientific community. But it did convince a large number of paediatricians that Money’s hypothesis about the gender neutrality of babies had been flawed, and that his recommendation for the treatment of intersex children had, in many cases, caused more harm than good.
The acknowledgement that Money’s hypothesis was incorrect came too late for Reimer – the damage had already been done. As Slate recounts, after his brother overdosed on antidepressants in 2002 and his wife asked for a divorce, Reimer ended his own life in 2004. He was 38 years old.
Lessons not learned
John Money’s experiment was misdirected and cruel. In attempting to demonstrate that biological sex has no bearing on whether one is female or male he only succeeded in proving the opposite. That gender is not fluid. That it cannot be shaped at will through medical interventions and hormone treatment.
There’s little doubt today that Money’s experiment was a callous failure. The lives of Reimer, his brother and his parents were sacrificed at the altar of an early form of gender ideology. Yet, even now, too many have failed to learn the lessons of this tragedy. Institutions, from schools to healthcare, still happily promote the ideas of gender identity and genderfluidity. Many politicians still treat trans ideology as if it is a ‘progressive’ cause that only uncaring bigots would oppose. And children are still being used by gender ideologues as fodder for trans experimentation.
Yes, the Tavistock gender-identity clinic in the UK may be due to close over safety fears. But the idea that one can ‘be born in the wrong body’, that one’s maleness or femaleness has no relationship to one’s biological sex, is still being regularly promoted to children from a worryingly young age. Moreover, trans activists want to make it even easier for people to change gender. And the younger they are, it seems, the better.
No doubt many who uncritically embrace the tenets of gender ideology are entirely ignorant of its intellectual origins. They probably have no idea that it was Dr John Money who trailblazed the idea of the ‘trans child’. And they clearly have little inkling of the devastating impact Money’s ideas had on a young family all those years ago.
What happened to David Reimer was a tragedy for him and his family. Not learning from it would be a tragedy for all of us.
++++
The science of ‘transsexuality’ was founded in Berlin at the Institute of Sexual Science where the first male-to-female surgery was performed. The words ‘homosexual’ or ‘transvestite’ were coined at the institute.
This was due in part to its liberal laws, which allowed for gender reassignment surgeries as early as 1920. The book reveals that the city was also known for its vibrant LGBTQ+ nightlife and culture, featuring drag shows, cabaret, and a vibrant gay and lesbian scene. This was in stark contrast to the Nazi regime’s policies.
The book describes how the city’s LGBTQ+ culture was able to survive during World War II and the post-war period, with the help of cabaret and drag shows, as well as underground gay bars and clubs. The book also discusses the impact of the Berlin Wall, which split the city in two and divided the LGBTQ+ community.
While East Berlin became a more conservative environment, West Berlin was known as a safe haven for LGBTQ+ people. The book is a fascinating look at a unique period of history in Berlin, and reveals the city’s long history as a liberal, ‘open-minded’ haven for those seeking to express their gender identity and sexuality.
The Institute for Sexual Science, founded by Magnus Hirschfeld in 1919, was a pioneering organization that aimed to promote a better understanding of sexual health and rights. However, on May 6th, 1933, the Nazis stormed the institute and ransacked it, destroying much of the research and materials it had collected.
Magnus Hirschfeld was a Jewish German sexologist and LGBTQ activist who made significant contributions to the field of queer rights in the early 20th century. He is widely considered to be one of the most influential figures in the queer rights movement.
Hirschfeld was a prolific writer, having written several books and articles on a variety of topics related to gender and sexuality. One of his most famous publications was Berlin’s Third Sex, which he published in 1904. This book was an early look at gender variance in early 20th-century Germany, which had a thriving drag scene and a burgeoning transgender community.
The book helped to increase Hirschfeld’s profile and ultimately led to him becoming one of the most prominent LGBTQ activists in the world. Hirschfeld was also involved in writing one of the first gay characters to appear in a film, for the 1919 movie Different From the Others. His work helped to lay the groundwork for the acceptance of LGBTQ people in Germany and around the world. Hirschfeld’s activism and writings have had a lasting impact and continue to influence the modern LGBTQ rights movement.
Hirschfeld was the first to coin the term “transvestite” and was also a fierce advocate for the rights of sex workers, and for the decriminalization of contraception and abortion.
This was in direct opposition to the Nazi’s ideals of morality and their belief that homosexuality was a degenerative disease. As a result, they were determined to destroy Hirschfeld’s work, and they closed the Institute in order to suppress any further research into sexual science.
The Nazis justified their actions by claiming that the Institute was promoting “un-German” ideas. Magnus Hirschfeld was a pioneering figure in the field of sexual science, and his Institute was the first of its kind. He believed that sexual orientation was a natural phenomenon, and advocated for the rights of LGBTQ+ people.
Hirschfeld’s work and activism inspired the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, who was also a passionate advocate for reproductive rights and women’s health. Sanger was highly influenced by Hirschfeld’s writings on the importance of contraception, and she used his ideas in her work.
Sanger was a strong proponent of the decriminalization of contraception and abortion, and she was an important figure in the fight leading up to the Supreme Court’s Roe v Wade decision.
Planned Parenthood produced a memo recommending strategies for population control. These include “restructuring the family,” encouragement of increased homosexuality, tax-funded abortion, “fertility control agents in the water supply,” and sterilization. They then went on and implemented all of these
Margaret Sanger, a prominent leader in the birth control movement in the early 20th century, had many Jewish allies. Her cause was one that was shared by many Jews, given their long history of oppression and the struggle to support large families in difficult economic conditions. Sanger was a passionate advocate for reproductive rights and her passion resonated with many members of the Jewish community.
In particular, Sanger had close ties with the National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW), a non-sectarian organization dedicated to social justice. NCJW supported Sanger’s efforts to bring birth control information and access to women, and many of its members actively worked to promote her cause.
The organization was also influential in lobbying for legislative action that would legalize the use of birth control. In addition to the NCJW, Sanger had the support of several Jewish doctors, including Dr. Abraham Stone, who was instrumental in setting up the first birth control clinic in the United States.
Sanger also had a close bond with Anna Lifschiz, who was a Jewish physician and an early supporter of Sanger’s work. Lifschiz was a strong advocate for women’s reproductive rights and was an important source of support for Sanger. In addition to providing moral and financial support, Lifschiz also wrote several articles in support of Sanger’s cause.
Other Jewish allies included the American Jewish Congress, which passed a resolution in 1923 expressing their support for Sanger’s work, and the American Jewish Committee, which provided funding for Sanger’s clinics. Sanger also had strong ties with Jewish philanthropist, Margaret H. Stern, who funded several of Sanger’s initiatives, including the creation of the American Birth Control League in 1921.
The support of these Jewish allies was instrumental in helping Sanger to advance her cause and to make birth control more widely available. By working together, they were able to create a powerful force that helped to shape the course of history.
The Frankfurt School
The Frankfurt School, a group of German-Jewish intellectuals in the early 20th century, has been credited as the architects of leftism.
This group of thinkers, whose members included Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, and Walter Benjamin, sought to create a new form of critical theory that sought to understand the cause of the human condition and the oppressive forces that kept it from achieving its full potential. Through their works, these intellectuals sought to develop a critical analysis of society, culture, and politics that could be applied to later modern society.
Critical Race Theory emerged from the Frankfurt School’s work on the intersection of race and class. The theorists argue that racism is embedded in the very structures of society and that economic and academic outcomes are not merely a product of inputs from communities or idividuals. This theory has been highly influential in examining race in the United States and has been adapted to other contexts such as education and the workplace.
Gender Studies also emerged from the Frankfurt School’s critical theories. These theorists argued that gender was not a “natural” category, but rather a social construct used to maintain power dynamics between men and women. This theory has been used to examine gender inequality in many areas, such as the workplace and politics.
The Frankfurt School of thought spread to the United States in the aftermath of World War II. Many of the members of the school, including Horkheimer and Adorno, were forced to flee Nazi Germany and found their way to America. They brought their ideas with them and began teaching at universities like Columbia and Princeton.
Their ideology has had a significant influence on American intellectual life. It helped to shape the New Left movement, which sought to challenge the status quo and bring about social and political change. It also had an impact on the development of postmodernism and its focus on the power dynamics of knowledge.
Who Were the True Founders of Communism and the Architects of the Russian Revolution?
The role of Jewish intellectuals in the development of communism has been an area of significant historical interest. This is largely due to the fact that a number of the most influential figures in the early development of the ideology, such as Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky (Bronstein), were Jewish.
This had a profound impact on the way in which the ideology was expressed and developed, with Jewish values and experiences playing a major role in its evolution. Jewish intellectuals have often been viewed as playing a key role in the development of communism, due to the fact that they were often among the most educated members of their communities and had a strong sense of social justice.
This was true of both Marx and Trotsky, who were both passionate advocates for social and economic justice and sought to bring about a more equitable society.
The fact that many of the leading lights of communism were Jewish, as well as the fact that Jewish values and experiences played a significant role in its development, has had a huge impact on the way in which the ideology has been expressed and understood over the years.
It has also led to some criticism of the ideology from those who view it as being overly influenced by Jewish values, rather than being based on a universal set of principles. Nevertheless, it remains clear that Jewish intellectuals were at the forefront of the development of communism and their legacy continues to be felt today.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was a pivotal event in history that changed the political landscape of the world. It is widely known that communists were at the forefront of the revolution, leading the charge toward a new political and social order. However, what is less well-known is that many of these communists were Jewish.
During the late 19th century, Jews in Russia were facing increasing persecution and discrimination from the Tsar’s regime. As a result, many Jews chose to find solace in the revolutionary ideologies of Marxism and anarchism. These ideologies provided a platform for Jews to fight for their rights and for a better life for their people. As the revolution gained momentum, many Jews joined the ranks of the revolutionary forces.
Jews made up a significant portion of the Bolshevik Party, including leaders such as Grigory Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev, and Yakov Sverdlov. Jews also made up a large portion of the Petrograd Soviet, a major player in the revolution. In fact, Jews comprised around half of the Soviet’s Executive Committee.
Jews were also involved in the early stages of the Bolshevik uprising, such as the storming of the Winter Palace and the establishment of the Soviet government. Jews played a significant role in the October Revolution, which led to the establishment of the first communist government in the world.
The genocides perpetrated by Jewish Russian Communists in the early 20th century are some of the most horrific and least discussed crimes of the twentieth century. From 1918 to 1921, approximately seven million people, mostly Ukrainians, were systematically murdered or exiled in what is known as the Holodomor, or the Great Famine.
The Soviet Union’s policy of “War Communism” was responsible for this tragedy. War Communism was a Soviet economic and political system that forced peasants to give up their private property and their produce to the state in exchange for a meager ration. This led to a famine in 1919-1920 in which millions of people died from starvation.
In addition to the Holodomor, Jewish Russian Communists also perpetrated the Red Terror during the Russian Civil War, which was a campaign of mass executions and deportations of those deemed to be enemies of the new Soviet state. Between 1918 and 1921, the Red Terror resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.
The Red Terror, a period of extreme violence and repression in Soviet Russia, was perpetrated by Jewish revolutionaries who had taken power in the aftermath of the October 1917 Revolution. During this time, Bolshevik leaders such as Leon Trotsky and Grigory Zinoviev led a campaign of terror and intimidation against their perceived enemies, including those who opposed the revolution and the new communist government.
This was done with the active support of the secret police, known as the Cheka, which was led by Felix Dzerzhinsky, a Jewish revolutionary. The Red Terror was characterized by mass arrests, executions, and torture. Thousands of people were killed, and many more were sent to labor camps or exiled. Those targeted included members of the former Tsarist government, clergy, intellectuals, and other opponents of the revolution.
Joseph Stalin removed Leon Trotsky from power in the Soviet Union. Stalin had Trotsky removed from his positions in the Communist Party and the Soviet government. In 1929, Trotsky was exiled from the Soviet Union, and in 1940 he was assassinated in Mexico by an agent of the Soviet secret police.
+++
The Banned Truth About the Jewish Origins of Modern Leftism
by
Daily Veracity Staff
February 3, 2023
13 minute read
No comments
The idea of being ‘woke’ or being aware of social injustices has been around for centuries, but it was not until the late 19th and early 20th centuries that the concept gained widespread attention.
Philosopher Ferdinand Lassalle was one of the first to popularize the idea of being ‘awakened’ to the evils of the world. In his works, Lassalle argued that people needed to be aware of the injustices and inequalities that existed in their own societies, and that they needed to strive to end them.
Ferdinand Johann Gottlieb Lassalle, born on 11 April 1825 in Poland, was the son of Heyman Lassal, a Jewish silk merchant. Lassalle was the first man in Europe who succeeded in organizing a party of socialist action”, or as the revolutionary socialist Rosa Luxemburg put it: “Lassalle managed to wrestle from history in two years of flaming agitation what needed many decades to come about.”
Lassalle’s involvement was pivotal in establishing the Frankfurt School, widely recognized as the birthplace of contemporary leftism. Additionally, he had a strong bond with Max Weber, an important figure in sociology, and was a major source of inspiration for Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin, two Jewish German philosophers from the Frankfurt School.
Moses Hess is also considered to be one of the fathers of modern leftism. Hess is most well-known for his book, The Holy History of Mankind, which was published in 1837 and is considered to be the first work to coin the term “socialism”.
Hess was influenced by the French Revolution and the ideas of the Enlightenment. He believed that society should be based on justice, equality, and freedom and that the state should be a vehicle for the realization of these ideals. Hess was also a strong advocate for internationalism.
Hess and the founder of the Frankfurt School, Carl Grünberg, had a close intellectual relationship that spanned several decades. Hess, a German-Jewish philosopher and one of the founding fathers of Zionism, and Grünberg, a German-Jewish philosopher and Marxist, met in the 1880s and quickly became close friends and collaborators.
In their joint work, Hess and Grünberg developed a unique synthesis of the two schools of thought. Hess was a proponent of utopian socialism, while Grünberg was a Marxist. In their collaborations, the two sought to combine elements of both philosophies to create a new synthesis that sought to take the best of both traditions.
The two men also shared a commitment to Jewish emancipation and the struggle for a Jewish homeland. Hess himself was an ardent Zionist and Grünberg was a supporter of the Zionist cause. Together, they worked to promote the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine.
The Forbidden History of the Frankfurt School
The Frankfurt School, a group of German-Jewish intellectuals in the early 20th century, has been credited by many over the years as the ‘architects of leftism.’
This group of thinkers, whose members included Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Carl Greenberg, and Walter Benjamin, sought to create a new form of critical theory that sought to understand the cause of the human condition and the oppressive forces that kept it from achieving its full potential. Through their works, these intellectuals sought to develop a critical analysis of society, culture, and politics that could be applied to later modern society.
Critical Race Theory emerged from the Frankfurt School’s work on the intersection of race and class. The theorists argue that racism is embedded in the very structures of society and that economic and academic outcomes are not merely a product of inputs from communities or individuals. This theory has been highly influential in examining race in the United States and has been adapted to other contexts such as education and the workplace.
Gender Studies also emerged from the Frankfurt School’s critical theories. These theorists argued that gender was not a “natural” category, but rather a social construct used to maintain power dynamics between men and women. This theory has been used to examine gender inequality in many areas, such as the workplace and politics.
The Frankfurt School of thought spread to the United States in the aftermath of World War II. Many of the members of the school, including Horkheimer and Adorno, were forced to flee Nazi Germany and found their way to America. They brought their ideas with them and began teaching at universities like Columbia and Princeton.
Their ideology has had a significant influence on American intellectual life. It helped to shape the New Left movement, which sought to challenge the status quo and bring about social and political change. It also had an impact on the development of postmodernism and its focus on the power dynamics of knowledge.
Georg (György) Lukács was a Hungarian-Jewish Marxist philosopher and literary theorist who is widely considered to be one of the architects of leftism.
Born in 1885 to a wealthy Jewish family in Budapest, Lukács was exposed to a variety of philosophical and political ideas from his youth, which would eventually inform his writings and activism. As a Jewish thinker, Lukács was highly conscious of the plight of Jews in Europe, and the harsh realities of anti-Semitism.
He was also deeply influenced by the legacy of 19th-century Jewish intellectuals like Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and Rosa Luxemburg. Lukács was a major contributor to the Frankfurt School, an influential group of German-Jewish intellectuals who sought to apply Marxist theory to the modern world. Lukács wrote several works, including History and Class Consciousness, which laid the foundations for critical theory and the development of leftism. In addition to his writings, Lukács was also an active participant in political movements.
He was a member of the Hungarian Communist Party, and after the Soviet Union occupied Hungary in 1945, Lukács was appointed as Minister of Culture. The influence of Lukács and the Frankfurt School on leftism cannot be overstated. Through their writings and activism, they developed a critical approach to social and political analysis that has informed the development of leftism in the 20th and 21st centuries.
Lukács served as the deputy commissar for culture in the Hungarian Soviet Republic in 1919. Lukács’ tenure as deputy commissar for culture was marked by a number of controversial initiatives, including a program of ‘cultural terrorism’ and a radical sex education program.
The radical sex education program implemented by Lukács was designed to promote sexual freedom. It was based on the theories of Wilhelm Reich, who argued that sexual repression was a major cause of social ills. Under the program, schools taught students about contraception, venereal disease, and sexual pleasure. It also encouraged free sexual expression, including the acceptance of homosexuality. Although Lukács’ initiatives were controversial, they were a major factor in the emergence of a new culture in Hungary during the Soviet.
The Frankfurt School also drew heavily from the work of Georg Simmel, proposing that class and economics were only one factor in determining social structure and that other forms of oppression such as racism, sexism, and ageism were equally important. This gave rise to the idea of intersectionality, which is the concept that multiple forms of oppression interact to create unique experiences for individuals.
Simmel’s work was largely focused on understanding how individuals interact with one another in modern societies. Simmel argued that modern societies are characterized by a “stratification of social roles” that is based on race, gender, and class. In other words, Simmel argued that in modern societies, individuals are grouped into different social categories based on their race, gender, and class. As a result, individuals within these categories experience different social opportunities and constraints based on their race, gender, and class.
This group of philosophers and sociologists sought to explain the social and economic conditions that had caused the rise of Nazi Germany. Through their work, they developed a critical theory that was focused on understanding the power dynamics between different social groups with the goal of creating a better society. This theory was based on the idea that there were certain forces at work in society that were creating and perpetuating oppression, and that these forces needed to be identified and addressed in order to create a more equitable and just society.
Some suggest that their aim of a diverse society, composed of people of all races, genders, and sexual orientations, in which Jews will not be subjected to discrimination, is being realized in the Western world today.
+++
And Now you know much more than before ....
No comments:
Post a Comment